The NFAEP continue to bully, harass and intimate my clients.
The NFAEP is continuing to cause harm by failuring to acknowledge nominated advocacy.
Discrimination against these vulnerable people who have been traumatised previously by the NFAEP is an absolute disgrace.
Hey Guys,
My client has nominated an advocate. This decision needs to he reviewed and I formally request, on behalf of my client, that this decision is referred to the review process.
You can not discriminate, as per Anti-Discriscriminated act or deny service.
Relevant sections supplied below.
My client has instructed me to communicate that under medical advice, from her registered GP, she is unable to communicate with the NFAEP due to the extreme stress and anxiety experienced as a direct result from the actions of the NFAEP.
To meet her Biosecurity obligations my client has engaged an advocate, Australian Advocacy Group, a lawful, registered business that assists create positive outcomes.
Should you wish to discuss her resonable excuse to obstruct officers, as is her right under section 336 of the Biosecurity Act 2014 QLD, you need to find away to mitigate harm to my client and engage in communications my client has nominated, via advocacy.
Feel free to reach out should you have any questions or require additional information.
In the meantime, until this issue is resolved, please place my client on a do not treat list.
Kind regards
Trevor Hold
0401 517 906
ANTI-DISCRIMINATION ACT 1991 – SECT 46
Discrimination in goods and services area
46 Discrimination in goods and services area
DISABILITY SERVICES ACT 2006 – SECT 31
Raising and resolving grievances
Leave a Reply